Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  83 / 106 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 83 / 106 Next Page
Page Background

78

volunteer). Additionally, upon request, an advisor can be appointed from the Sexual

Misconduct Hearing Board pool.

4.

Standard of Evidence

– When determining if a violation of the sexual misconduct policy

has occurred, the standard of evidence to be used by any conduct authority is preponderance

of evidence. Preponderance of evidence indicates that a violation is more likely than not to

have occurred.

5.

Administrative Conduct Meeting

– If both the alleged target or victim of misconduct and

respondent request to have an incident of sexual misconduct handled administratively, the

Dean of Students will render a decision as to whether the respondent violated the sexual

misconduct policy and assess sanctions if required. If the complainant and respondent accept

the findings/sanctions of the Dean of Students, the matter will be closed. If not, the matter

will be referred to the Sexual Misconduct Hearing Board.

6.

Sexual Misconduct Hearing Board

– The Dean of Students may refer an investigation to

the Sexual Misconduct Hearing Board (“the Board”), comprised of faculty, staff, and

students from a pool of trained Board members. The Board is a three or five member panel

that consists of a minimum of one student, one staff member, and one faculty member. When

a five member panel is called, a minimum of two students should serve on the board. The

Board will hear the results of the Dean’s investigation along with the testimony from relevant

witnesses including the alleged target or victim of sexual misconduct and respondent, and

review any other appropriate materials. They will reach decisions regarding violations and

sanctions, as appropriate. Details regarding the procedures of the Board are outlined below.

Sexual Misconduct Hearing Board Procedures

The procedure for a hearing will be as follows:

1.

The Vice President of Student Development serves as convener and chair. The chair

participates in the hearing but does not vote on the hearing outcomes.

2.

A three or five member panel is selected from the Sexual Misconduct Hearing Board pool.

The Board will consist of a minimum of one student, one staff member, and one faculty

member. When a five member panel is called, a minimum of two students should serve on

the board.

3.

The Dean of Students will serve as the presenter. The presenter presents information gathered

during the investigation, but does not recommend sanctions.

4.

Due to the sensitive nature of these hearings, the alleged victim or target of sexual

misconduct and respondent may be kept separate throughout the hearing, appearing before

the Board at designated times but able to hear all statements made within the hearing.

5.

No witness, other than the respondent or alleged victim or target of sexual misconduct, if

he/she chooses to testify, will be allowed to hear the testimony of other witnesses.

6.

Before testifying, each student witness will be reminded that their statements are bound by

the Honor Code, and employee witnesses will be reminded that their testimony is expected to

be truthful under penalty of termination of employment.