Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  33 / 106 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 33 / 106 Next Page
Page Background

28

appeal a termination for cause, which has a separate and distinct procedure.

III.B.5.b. Initiation of a Grievance

If the faculty member concerned believes that a procedural irregularity occurred in the

process of the College’s reaching a decision with regard to his or her tenure, promotion,

or non-reappointment, then he or she has the right to request that a special College

Grievance Committee be appointed to hear the complaint and to make a formal

recommendation to the President. Under no circumstances, however, shall this committee

have any jurisdiction with regard to substantive issues or concerns regarding such

decision. If the faculty member concerned wishes the appointment of a special College

Grievance Committee, he or she notifies the President within fifteen days of receipt of the

written notice of the President's decision. Upon receipt of the request for a special

College Grievance Committee, the President, or the Provost at the President's request,

asks the Faculty Advisory Committee to provide, within seven days, the names of seven

tenured faculty members who are able to serve on such a committee. From the list of

seven, the faculty member concerned and the President, or the President's representative,

strike two names each to form the special College Grievance Committee consisting of

three faculty members. The Committee elects its own chair and determines its own rules

and procedures. Its jurisdiction is limited to that stated above and does not extend to other

matters.

III.B.5.c. Role of the Grievance Committee

Upon the request of an aggrieved faculty member as described above, the Committee

may inquire into the procedural aspects of that particular decision-making process. The

Grievance Committee shall serve as an advisory committee to the Provost and the

President. The Committee has the privilege of access to an

evaluation file, kept in the

Provost’s Office, on the faculty member concerned. The Committee may also discuss the

procedural aspects of the faculty member's case with the appropriate Department Chair,

the Area Chair, the Promotion and Tenure Committee, and the Provost. The Committee

does not, however, conduct a formal hearing.

After the Committee inquires into the procedural aspects of the case, it reports its

opinions and recommendations, in writing, to the President and to the candidate. If the

Committee expresses the opinion that no procedural irregularity occurred, and if the

President agrees, the President declares the matter closed; that decision is final. If the

Committee expresses the opinion that a procedural irregularity occurred, the President

makes a determination regarding the matter. If the President determines that a procedural

irregularity occurred, he or she may direct that the process begin anew at any such step as

the President may direct, or the President may direct other action such as he or she deems

appropriate. If the President disagrees with the opinion of the Committee, the Committee

is so informed, and the matter is closed. In any event, the decision of the President is

final, and further appeals are not available.